Provenance
Check for Content Credentials and other signed origin information when present.
Independent educational resource
Learn how provenance, file metadata, and visual model signals can help assess an image—and where each signal can fail. Live image scanning is currently unavailable while provider review continues.
Educational content · No image upload · No live classifier
Evidence ledger
An image can lose metadata when it is screenshotted, compressed, cropped, or reposted. A visual classifier can also be wrong. These guides keep different kinds of evidence separate.
Check for Content Credentials and other signed origin information when present.
Review software, encoding, dimensions, and modification clues without treating missing metadata as proof.
Use a visual classifier as one signal, with model information and limitations shown beside the result.
Process
Choose a supported image from your device or clipboard.
Check available provenance, file metadata, and model-based visual signals.
Understand why a conclusion was reached and what cannot be determined.
Illustrative result anatomy
This is an educational example, not an analysis of an uploaded image and not output from a live provider.
State what was actually found, including when evidence is missing or unavailable.
Explain what the observation may support without turning uncertainty into proof.
Identify transformations, missing context, and other reasons the signal may be wrong.
Seven-state contract
None of these states should be treated as proof of authorship, intent, fraud, or misconduct.
Recognized signed provenance or a generator declaration is present.
Multiple available signals are consistent with AI generation or editing.
Available signals disagree or are too weak for a clear conclusion.
Signals lean toward camera or human origin, but AI involvement cannot be ruled out.
The file does not contain enough reliable evidence for a useful conclusion.
The file could not be safely parsed or is not supported.
The scan ended before a result could be produced.
Interpret carefully
Before sharing a suspicious social post; when reviewing a profile, product, marketplace, or publication photo; and whenever an image’s source or editing history is unclear.
Do not use a scan result as the sole basis for discipline, grading, employment, credit, housing, legal, or other high-stakes decisions.
Current availability
The public site is intentionally content-only. No image upload, classifier request, account, payment, or advertising is active. Privacy-friendly aggregate analytics measures site usage without analytics cookies.
Questions
No. A scanner can surface provenance, metadata, and model-based signals, but those signals may be incomplete or wrong. Treat the result as one part of a broader verification process.
No. The public site currently has no image upload or live classifier. The feature remains disabled while provider and data-handling terms are reviewed.
No account is required to read the current educational site, and no account feature is active.
Missing metadata does not mean an image is human-made. Social platforms, screenshots, editing tools, and compression can remove or change metadata.
It may surface signals associated with AI editing, but coverage varies by tool, edit, and file history. Review the evidence and limitations shown with each result.
No. The result is not proof of authorship, intent, cheating, or fraud. Use source verification and qualified human review, especially for consequential decisions.
Verify before you decide
Learn what provenance, metadata, and model inference can—and cannot—tell you.